The Philippine government seems to have a total disregard for “public concern”. Government officials have been pushing Constitutional limits for years, invoking legal loopholes to keep secrets from those who have the most to lose from their actions: the Filipino people.
On
February 24, 2006, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo felt the need to
issue Proclamation 1017 declaring a State of National Emergency for
fear of a violent government takeover. It was lifted a week later.
The Supreme Court (SC) declared it constitutional, but the actions
done by the military and ordered by the Arroyo administration in its
name were far from constitutional. Media companies such as Abante,
ABS-CBN and GMA 7 were secured by military forces, while the Daily
Tribune office was raided. Media practitioners were outraged. “What
is this, martial law? Does the state of national emergency allow the
policemen of President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo to just confiscate
anything they please?” Daily Tribune publisher Niñez Cacho
Olivares said
on February 25, 2006.
A
series of presidential declarations followed aiming to make it easier
to stop, or at least hamper, the flow of information from government
agencies to inquisitive citizens. First came Executive Order (EO)
464, parts of which were declared unconstitutional by the SC,
prohibiting officials from attending hearings about the “Hello
Garci” incident. Then came Memorandum Circular 108, saying
officials needed Presidential consent before they could appear for
questioning. Afterwards came EO 608, establishing a security protocol
for government agencies to determine the confidentiality of
documents, which legal experts said go against Philippine
jurisprudence as individual agencies cannot decide what it can and
will not release to the public. Filipinos have the right to
information, especially if documents are related to issues of public
interest. “Section 7” of the Bill
of Rights specifically says that
“...information on matters of public concern shall be recognized.
Access to official records, and to documents and papers pertaining to
official acts, transactions, or decisions, as well as to government
research data used as basis for policy development, shall be afforded
the citizen, subject to such limitations as may be provided by law.”
The
government has routinely kept secret the details of treaties and
pacts, making excuses for its silence when opposition groups and the
media bring these agreements to light. For example, details of the
Japan-Philippines Economic Partnership Agreement (JPEPA) were kept
secret, and the SC has affirmed the treaty's confidentiality, though
parts of it such as the reduction of tariffs on toxic materials are
clearly of public interest and may adversely affect the well-being of
the Filipino people.
That
secrecy is part of the agreements themselves, such as in the “ASEAN
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on the Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipeline
(TAGP)”, is not an excuse. “Article
V” of the MoU, for example, states that “All Member
Countries shall undertake to observe the confidentiality of
documents, information or data received pursuant to the
implementation of this Memorandum of Understanding. This obligation
shall be observed by Member Countries during the period of validity
of this Memorandum of Understanding and after the expiry or
termination of this Memorandum of Understanding, unless otherwise
agreed by all Member Countries.”
If the government had any respect for its citizens, it
would have insisted on changes to the text, allowing for some
semblance of transparency. Engaging in secret deals regarding
national resources, especially if the Philippines will be one of the
sources and private contractors will be engaged, should not be done.
There should be discourse: the Congress should have been
consulted, at the very least notified, and there should be guarantees
of safeguards preventing corrupt government practices to change a
potentially beneficial project into another lunatic deal.
Furthermore, there should be guidelines protecting the Philippines
and the other Southeast Asian signatories from advantages any one
country would have over the other. All parties except Singapore are
producers of natural gas, though Cambodia and Laos have little to no
industry development.
The
government's recent signing of a Memorandum
of Agreement on Ancestral Domain (MoA-AD) with the Moro Islamic
Liberation Front (MILF) without telling anyone should be the last
straw in a steadily increasing pile of wrongs. The government is now
trying to fix the mess it has gotten its citizens into, raising
issues of Charter Change and secession, not to mention having to
prevent the start of a war in Mindanao.
No government is perfect, and neither is its citizens. Two-way communication is important, to prevent a country from going up in flames.
Photo: Alaskan Pipeline, Paxson by Steve Deger, c/o Flickr. Licensed under Creative Commons license number BY-2.0-DEED.EN.
Twitter
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Yahoo
Googlize this
Facebook









