The Philippine Online Chronicles

The POC
Wednesday
Feb 08
Home POC Presents

Sound and fury over 'book blockade'

8865541_by_mayhemproject.jpg Robin Hemley's article "The Great Book Blockade of 2009", posted on the McSweeney's site, has had the blogosphere stirred up for some time now. In a nutshell: the Bureau of Customs (BOC), later backed by the Department of Finance (DOF), imposed duty on international books entering the country, in spite of a United Nations treaty prohibiting such acts.

The levy on imported books stemmed "in part [from]...the success of one book, Twilight by Stephenie Meyer." When customs examiner Rene Agulan saw how much cash the vampire series raked in from its Filipino fans, "he demanded that duty be paid on it."

The importer of the Twilight series, paying the duty imposed by the customs official, set the "precedent for duties to be imposed on other book shipments," reported philstar.com. Agulan halted the entry of other imported books to squeeze more from Meyer's creation.

Hemley later clarified that only air shipments of imported books were frozen.

The Philippines, as signatory of the Florence Agreement in 1952, agreed to the free flow of "education, scientific, and cultural materials."

However, DOF undersecretary Estela Sales backed up the customs policy by reinterpreting the Florence Agreement and Republic Act (RA) 8047 or the Book Publishing Industry Development Act. RA 8047 specifically provides for the "tax and duty-free importation of books or raw materials to be used in book publishing."

"For lack of a comma after the word 'books,' the undersecretary argued that only books 'used in book publishing' (her underlining) were tax-exempt," Hemley wrote.

Presently, 1% tax is being demanded for educational, technical, scientific, historical and cultural books, with 5% duty for non-educational books/materials.


Legality in question

The book blockade issue already earned the ire of a few politicians, who were quick to blast the BOC's actions.

Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago said the BOC's reinterpretation of RA 8047, aside from being in direct violation of the Florence Agreement, "has no legal basis."

"The Philippines is bound by this treaty under the principle of pacta sund servanda. This simply means that every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith," Defensor-Santiago was quoted as saying on philstar.com.

Makati City mayor Jejomar Binay said the BOC should pounce on smugglers instead of book importers in their attempt to answer for their P140 billion worth of loss in tariffs and taxes.

"The (BOC) should go after smugglers and plug the losses. They should get their priorities straight and for me, collecting P140 billion in lost tariffs and taxes should be their priority. They are either neglectful of their duty or they tolerate smuggling," Binay said.

Senator and 2010 presidentiable Mar Roxas asked DOF secretary Margarito Teves to "list down the legal basis for the issuance of the department order and to cite appropriate customs laws and rules in support of the implementation of the directive." He emphasized that this should be done before the school year starts.

The National Book Development Association of the Philippines came out with their position paper regarding the issue. According to them, "the Department of Finance is breaking international and its own laws imposing this tax, the National Book Development Board has the sole authority to determine when and how and if books are to be taxed and anyway Republic Act No. 8047 is the last word on this subject."


Bloggers' wrath


Since Hemley's article was posted over the internet, bloggers were on the front lines of disseminating the controversial article by forwarding it through email, re-posting it on their blogs, and giving their own two cents. For weeks now, various reactions-from political dissections of the issue to emotional tirades against the powers-that-be-were in free-flow on the web.

Andro Ramirez, blogging for donavictorina, focused on the issue of the "missing comma": "I used to make fun at how former Senator Leticia Ramos Shahani would be so particular where to put proper punctuations during deliberations in a legislative bill in the Senate. Now, I see the wisdom in her ways. Leave it to our government to misinterpret a 59-year-old international treaty and mesh it with an internal book-publishing act, all because of a missing comma."

Andro goes on to poke fun at Sales: "Bravo Undersecretary Sales. You have now become a bane to us book lovers, and it took your genius to unabashedly state that the common interpretation of the Florence Agreement was wrong for 59 years. Where were you when Harry Potter was weaving his magic on book sales? Whose book interest grew due to the success of the movie versions? And because government got away with it, eventually, they came up with 1% tax on educational books and 5% tax on non-educational books."

Tina of refineme.org asks: "Tell me, when are books never educational? Regardless if it's fiction or non-fiction? Or cultural, even? when is a book not educational? (This really baffles me)."

Blogger alizarinred says, "If there is one thing I feel that the government needs to pay more attention to, it is education. And with this stupid ban imposed upon books, how the heck are we going to improve our country's literacy rates? It's bad enough that kids today don't read as much as the generations before them used to; they're either playing at the arcade or staring at the TV/computer all day playing addicting video games or doing God knows what in who knows where. But now we have to deal with fewer good reads coming in to the country.

She continues, "This so-called Great Book Blockade of 2009 is totally overrated. It's the result of some Customs official's dumbed down interpretation of the Florence Agreement. Ah, but then again what can you expect from the lucky plundering idiots we've got high up in the government? Bet they've never even read a book in their crummy little lives."

Commenter aleafofgrass says, "It's not really the tax that's bothering me. It's the opportunism, the violation of a treaty and a law, and the equal measure of ignorance and arrogance being displayed by the concerned government officials. Taxes are fine, provided they are imposed for the right reasons and most importantly, that citizens reap the benefits. Ha, another utopian dream. Let's all just continue to make noise about this issue until this nonsense is scrapped."


One step at a time

The blogosphere spearheaded advocacy sites to generate noise in hopes of convincing government officials to take action.

A cause site was put up on social networking site Facebook called "Filipinos Against the Taxation of Books," attracting almost 11,700 members to date. "Through this cause group we hope to gather enough popular support and call the attention of lawmakers and government officials who are also members of Facebook - hopefully some of them may champion this cause," the description states.

Similarly, a petition site "fueled by disgust over the recent book blockade in the Philippines" was also put together, targeting the BOC and Sales in particular. The petition site, as of this posting, has collected 178 signatures.

"10,000 members! This is the sort of thing that inspires confidence about the future," Manuel L. Quezon III commented at the Facebook account. "But Customs remains defiant. Locsin's letter has been ignored. Officials think this will blow over. So maybe the organizers of this group should consider crafting a sustained campaign to inform others of the issue, and pester government and media? It can be done!"

Hemley agreed with Quezon saying "the FB [Facebook] group is amazing, but it's important to take it outside, too, and make sure the issue can't be ignored by government officials."

As a sign of protest, Rock Ed Philippines organized "Bookbigayan 2009" on May 24 at Baywalk, Roxas Boulevard. They invite people to "bring used/old books to give away." Anyone can browse through the donated titles, and a maximum of 5 books per person can be taken. Books not taken will be donated to public schools.


Photo by Ofelia T. Sta. Maria.


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Newsvine! TwitThis
 
Comments
Add New RSS

Disclaimer: Comments posted here reflect our readers’ views and not the opinion of The Philippine Online Chronicles.

peachy reyes 19 May 09, 03:58 AM
im urrently working here at dhaka, bangladesh. It's a third world country but they don't put tax on books, all types of books. And this information is even posted in all bookstores, letting the people know that there is no tax on all books.
Jo Rom 19 May 09, 03:37 PM
Undersecretary Estela Sales probably needs to go back to school, or learn to be a better reader and take the time to research materials at hand before she opens her mouth. I do not know what she studied in school, but I can rest assure her that due to the nature of this so-called book blockade, I have to put in my two cents.
I have to ask her first of all, about the "coma" issue. If you read the document in its entirety, which is, by the way, readily availabel on the UNESCO website as well as other websites, it is clearly written:

Article I

1. The contracting States undertake not to apply customs duties or other charges on, or in connection with, the importation of:

(a) Books, publications and documents, listed in Annex A to this Agreement;

(b) Educational, scientific and cultural materials, listed in Annexes B, C, D and E to this Agreement; which are the products of another contracting State, subject to the conditions laid down in those annexes.

2. The provisions of paragraph 1 of this article shall not prevent any contracting State from levying on imported materials :

(a) Internal taxes or any other internal charges of any kind, imposed at the time of importation or subsequently, not exceeding those applied directly or indirectly to like domestic products;

(b) Fees and charges, other than customs duties, imposed by governmental authorities on, or in connection with, importation, limited in amount to the approximate cost of the services rendered, and representing neither an indirect protection to domestic products nor a taxation of imports for revenue purposes.

See the coma after the word books in 1(a)?

Article I also references to Annex A. Reading Annex A it says:

Annex A

Books, publications and documents

(i) Printed books.

(ii) Newspapers and periodicals.

(iii) Books and documents produced by duplicating processes other than printing.

(iv) Official government publications, that is, official, parliamentary and administrative documents published in their country of origin.

(v) Travel posters and travel literature (pamphlets, guides, time-tables, leaflets and similar publications), whether illustrated or not, including those published by private commercial enterprises, whose purpose is to stimulate travel outside the country of importation.

(vi) Publications whose purpose is to stimulate study outside the country of importation.

(vii) Manuscripts, including typescripts.

(viii) Catalogues of books and publications, being books and publications offered for sale by publishers or booksellers established outside the country of importation.

(ix) Catalogues of films, recordings or other visual and auditory material of an educational, scientific or cultural character, being catalogues issued by or on behalf of the United Nations or any of its Specialized Agencies.

(x) Music in manuscript or printed form, or reproduced by duplicating processes other than printing.

(xi) Geographical, hydrographical or astronomical maps and charts.

(xii) Architectural, industrial or engineering plans- and designs, and reproductions thereof, intended for study in scientific establishments or educational institutions approved by the competent authorities of the importing country for the purpose of duty-free admission of these types of articles.

Again, there is a coma on the first mention of "books". So where is the legal argument of the BOC and the DOF? Ms Sales, please do go back to school.
Jo Rom 19 May 09, 03:39 PM
Here is the UNESCO website, in particular the repository of the Florence Agreement.

http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=12074&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Jose A. Carillo 24 June 09, 06:45 AM
June 23, 2009

Dear Fellow Communicators in English,

Rather than just be a passive spectator of serious English misuse in the major broadsheets and TV networks, I have decided to start my own media English-usage watch to help their writers and editors fight grammatically and semantically fractured English. I have therefore created a new section called
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Title:
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."

Share on facebook

What is POC Presents?

POC Presents is a special channel at The Philippine Online Chronicles that aims to feature personalities and advocacies from different sectors of society who, through their uniquely inspirational stories, may serve as alternative icons for the Filipino.

Read more...

POC Presents Videos


Get the Flash Player to see this player.
Disclaimer