The Philippine Online Chronicles

Share this Twitter Digg Del.icio.us Reddit Yahoo Googlize this Facebook Export PDF Print E-mail

Quite recently I published several articles, “Is Gibo Teodoro ready to lead?” and  “Mendiola Massacre Facts” as well as “The Economic Vision and Platform of Noynoy Aquino.”  In those articles, I backed up my assertion with data either with videos and interviews or with historically verifiable information from books or blogs.  In those cases, I found that comments for those articles amount to the something.

They called me biased.

It isn't a bad nomenclature.  But I found it disappointing that that was the best people could muster. Why do you think I’ve drawn lines?

To be neutral is to be indifferent.

In fact it is good that there is the AntiPinoy crowd as well as the ProPinoy to balance it out.

I’m glad Schumey is letting us know about Manny Villar and answers the question, should Villar drop off the race.

So let me spell it out for you: of course I won’t hide my bias.  The problem with most Filipinos is that they fail to choose.  And when they do choose: they’re afraid to offend.

Why do you fear?

What are we so afraid of?

I turn to watch the so-called open forums, can’t help but be disgusted. The questions are so teevee-ish, so diluted as to respond to the lightest of minds. I’ve learned more about the candidates from Blog Watch than from watching TV. And yes, I’m biased towards blogwatch because the data is candid; the questions are from ordinary people whom I trust.

Back to the big open forums. I can’t help but think: this is our state of affairs? Our presidential candidates who play to the crowd?

Let’s take Mr. Teodoro. As I mentioned in my post, really smart and articulate kind of guy and whether it is Villar, Teodoro, Perlas, Gordon, Arroyo they all point out that that they’ve had enough experience to be able to run the country.

Isn’t it a fair assessment that Mr. Teodoro failed in his job as Department of National Defense (DND) chief and National Disaster Coordinating Council (NDCC) Chair?

I wrote that it isn’t fair for the guy to take on more than 3 decades of mismanagement, true. And yet, he started his job more than 20 months before Ondoy and given that amount of time, given how smart the guy is, given that he knows about climate change and Katrina and how the Philippines is always a victim of typhoons, why didn’t he cover his behind and tell his boss and congress, we need better rescue and relief system?

Then he goes on to say to Al Jazeera, and passes the blame.

Do I have to spell out the conclusion?

I wrote “Mendiola Massacre Facts,” because it is that time of year when the Militant Left ‘honors’ their heroes.  The assertion is that they’ve become irrelevant. I gave you the step- by-step account leading up to the day of the massacre.  I gave you the root cause and I wrote down what the independent commission determined who was at fault.

All the left could muster in its defense is that: “bias,” and “kawawa naman mga farmers.”

Everyone keeps saying we need to raise the discourse of our election.  We need to tackle real issues of the day. We need a serious and hard look at ourselves and decide where we proceed from here.

Yes, we lol’d when Erap made us laugh in those forums.

When Mr. Aquino stood before the Makati Business Club and announced his policy, how many of you stood and asked, “low taxes? How can we have low taxes when our revenues are falling?” Did you stand and say his ideas on Truth Commission were a mistake?  Did you stand and asked what does he mean by a through review of the Department of Agriculture?

And what do people come up with instead? “He’s walang alam.  He has no data. He rides on his dead parents.”

Tell us why his economic vision is wrong beyond words that say, “Where is he going to get money”.

It is either we start talking about real issues or we don’t.  It is either when presented with information, you think and say, crap, this bastard is wrong and here’s why.  You can’t simply say, for example, the Cult of Noynoy drives the candidacy of Mr. Aquino.  You can’t for example stand and say, Manny Villar is evil and not cite the controversy of C5 at Tiaga.  You cannot call Gibo Teodoro all sound and fury, signifying nothing without telling us how inept government was under his leadership during Ondoy.

You cannot stand before us and say Dick Gordon and Bayani Fernando are transformers and not cite what they’ve done for Subic and Marikina.  You cannot cite that they are transformers without letting us know of Gordon’s Red Cross work, and Fernando’s MMDA tenure.

Can you stand before a crowd and say, how utterly disgusted you are at both that while their expertise could be used in the next administration they are now, nuisances? Or stand that the changes they advocate are old now that time has passed them by?  Can you stand before a crowd and say, “no, they are not and they deserve to be heard, like Perlas deserves to be heard.”

Are you willing to talk about issues, raise the conversation and the debate and the discourse that advances our people’s interest or are you merely playing lip service?  If you need pointers, might I suggest you go checkout Hitler reacting to the RH Bill.  I urge you, speak now, or forever hold your peace.

______

Image is the Lorenz attractor is used under Creative Commons.