The Philippine Online Chronicles

The POC
Thursday
May 24
Home News Local Catholic groups, officials hit CCP art exhibit

Catholic groups, officials hit CCP art exhibit

Catholic bishops and Catholic groups are considering filing charges against the people behind the “sacrilegious and blasphemous” art exhibit at the Cultural Center of the Philippines (CCP) if they fail to stop the exhibit in 48 hours.

According to Pro-life Philippines president Eric Manalang, they will be filing a case by Thursday afternoon against CCP officials and artists who claimed to be from the University of Santo Tomas (UST) if they do not pull the plug on the exhibit “Kulo” and “if they do not also make amends because stopping is not enough. The damage has been done.”

The artwork featured in the exhibit, which is described as “A Gathering of Artists of the UST,” include a crucifix with a wooden penis and a Christ the King figurine with rabbit ears, among others. The exhibit was slated to run from June 17 to August 21.

Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines legal counsel Jo Imbong said that the exhibit violates Article 201 of the Revised Penal Code on Immoral Exhibitions as well as the legal mandate of CCP.

May kaparusahan ‘yung mga gumagawa ng public exhibit na ang laman ng exhibit ay mga bagay na insulto sa relihiyon… May liability kasi you are offending the religious belief of a country [with] 85 percent Christians," Imbong explained.

Imbong also emphasized that the CCP should not have allowed the said exhibit because as a public agency, "It was created by law and funded by our taxes for the purpose of awakening the consciousness of our people to our cultural heritage."

“Is it our cultural heritage to mock and insult religious personages and icons? Is it aesthetic to vandalize a venerated representation of objects of worship and reverence? Is vulgarity and blasphemy a Filipino value? What Filipino pride can emerge for such works? Is this our national identity? And CCP promotes it?” she asked.

Caloocan Bishop Deogracias Iñiguez and retired Lingayen-Dagupan Archbishop Oscar Cruz described “Kulo” as “disrespectful of religious beliefs,” also urging the public to boycott the exhibit.

“They should be sensitive and respectful of those who might see it. They should respect the religion of others,” Iñiguez claimed.

"I’m ashamed of my alma mater. I’m a UST product, a Dominican product from head to foot. If these are the kind of artists (of) the so-called pontifical and royal university, then I renounce my alma mater. Bakit hindi nila napigilan ito? Bakit hanggang ngayon walang sinasabi? Parang bulag, pipi at bingi ang UST," Cruz said.

The artists and organizers have yet to issue a statement as of press time.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Newsvine! TwitThis
 
Comments
Add New RSS

Disclaimer: Comments posted here reflect our readers’ views and not the opinion of The Philippine Online Chronicles.

Dave 05 August 11, 12:38 PM
CCP = government institution
Government and its institution = SHOULD be secular(no religious preference for the benefit of all)

Exhibit offends Christians- therefore government should never have authorized that the exhibit be shown in CCP(gov. owned am I correct?)

If the exhibit was shown in a private building/ with coordination with private citizens, then no matter how irreligious and blasphemous the exhibit is, the artist has a right to showcase it.

Same goes with Crucifixes/other religious symbols- if a crucifix is placed in a government office (ex. LTO waiting area, Central Bank office--- not senator's office etc. get the the drift?) that is illegal, as other members of other religions or the nonreligious may find it offensive to their beliefs. As the government serves the people's interests, the crucifix should not be placed.
5455 07 August 11, 03:47 AM
WHAT????? You are talking nonsense! Any public official inaugurating in his/her public duty swear and execute this phrase while placing his/her left hand on the Bible, "...So help me God"

"So help me God" = a phrase often used to give an oath, and most commonly required as part of an oath of office. It is also used in some jurisdictions as a form of oath for other forms of public duty, such as an appearance in court, service as a juror, etc.
The essence of the phrase is a request to divine agency to render assistance (help) by being a guarantor of the oath taker's own honesty and integrity in the matter under question, and by implication invoking divine displeasure if the oath taker fails in their duty in this regard. It therefore implies greater care than usual in the act of the performance of one's duty, such as in testimony to the facts of the matter in a court of law

THE BEDROCK OF OUR CONSTITUTION IS THE NATURAL LAW OF THE DIVINE CREATOR AND THE WAYS OF MEN SHOULD PERMEATE THE IMAGE AND LIKENESS OF GOD
-To understand the Constitution and this government of laws, it is important that we realize that the founders saw that because the rights they were seeking to protect were God- given, Creator- endowed rights, they would not be able to be sustained in society unless they were protected under a code of law which was itself in harmony with the Creator's law. They called this higher law, "natural law" or the "laws of nature."



Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Title:
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."

Share on facebook